Turns out, it’s pretty difficult to insure crypto users and platforms

cointelegraph.com:

Crypto insurance providers spend enormous amounts of time judging whether to provide coverage to a crypto company, and almost none of them offer assurances to individuals, insurance and crypto executives told Cointelegraph.

Last year saw $3.9 billion stolen from crypto companies, decentralized finance platforms and users, a massive 22% rise from the prior year — and that’s only counting hacks and exploits. Some believe 2023 could be even worse.

Raymond Zenkich, president of cryptocurrency insurance firm Evertas, told Cointelegraph that it’s a complicated process to initially assess the risks of a crypto platform.

He explained that initially, an underwriting — the process of evaluating and analyzing the risks of insuring the assets — is performed “based on a very detailed application form” that involves crunching 2,000 variables across 20 risk areas.

“A significant risk factor is key management: whether keys are stored in hot, warm, or cold wallets,” Zenkich noted.

Hot, warm, and cold crypto wallets each have different levels of risk. Did you know that until we did it, there was no standard definition of hot vs. warm? Standards development is one way insurance helps emerging markets mature.https://t.co/5OtqpLa8Oh

He added that it doesn’t just stop there, as “there are several gradations of hot and warm, each with their own risk profile.”

On April 14, cryptocurrency exchange Bitrue suffered a hot wallet exploit, with attackers stealing nearly $23 million worth of crypto assets. The affected hot wallet held less than 5% of the exchange’s overall funds, and the remaining wallets have “not been compromised," according to the firm.

Zenkich explained that after determining the level of storage risk, the firm will then need to look at