Crypto Twitter was witness to a fierce debate this wee, with billionaire investor Mark Cuban accusing SEC’s Gary Gensler of throwing crypto under the bus while a former SEC official was quick to come to the regulator’s defense.
In a spirited, back-and-forth exchange on Twitter with former SEC officer John Reed Stark that started on June 14, Cuban took issue with Stark’s seeming defense of the SEC’s recent legal action against crypto exchange giant Binance.
Cuban accused Stark of misinterpreting the impact of the case and blamed SEC Chair Gary Gensler’s “regulation via litigation” approach for sabotaging crypto startups.
John. I think you are misreading the impact of what the judge said. It’s not related to this suit. Not all crypto businesses that have tokens or are considering using tokens are large “enterprises”. Which is the assumption, I believe you are making. (Correct me if I’m wrong…
Stark had earlier argued that crypto-related businesses should be treated as “large enterprises” by regulators. However, Cuban argued that many crypto businesses are small and shouldn't be told to “hire securities lawyers” just to get a start in the industry.
Stark also reiterated his support for the SEC’s actions against Binance, noting that the industry remains largely unregulated and that the move will eliminate “bad actors” and promote transparency.
From there, the debate pivoted to a discussion on how best to regulate cryptocurrencies, with Stark pushing the line that crypto assets should not be treated as “pink sheets or stocks.”
Conversely, Cuban called Stark’s take biased, suggesting that tokens could, in fact, be treated similarly to other securities and that the SEC should propose clearer guidelines for them.
Mark Cuban is a
Read more on cointelegraph.com